Previous
Notables
by date
September
SMTWTFS
 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
August
SMTWTFS
 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
July
SMTWTFS
 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
June
SMTWTFS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
May
SMTWTFS
 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
April
SMTWTFS
 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30
March
SMTWTFS
 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
February
SMTWTFS
 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29
January
SMTWTFS
 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
December
SMTWTFS
 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
November
SMTWTFS
 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
October
SMTWTFS
 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
Current Time: 02:54 PM Eastern

News

Teams E N S W All
D3sports.com
Network
News
Columns
Awards
Other departments
Coaches and SIDs
Interactive


Your support helps keep this site operating

New-look bracket long overdue
By Pat Coleman
D3football.com


Eight years after the Division III football playoff structure changed to allow for teams to move between regions and make the postseason brackets more balanced, the NCAA finally produced a bracket that attempted to make that a reality.

In a year in which no East Region team presented itself as a strong candidate for the top seed, it had one imported: Mount Union, the nine-time national champions. UW-Whitewater, the top seed in the West region last year and winners of consecutive all-expenses-paid trips to Salem, Va., was moved to the North as a top seed, while Central claimed the top spot in the West. Washington & Jefferson was the top seed in the South.

And all I can say is, it’s about time.

“We felt like we had a clear top four teams,” NCAA championships committee liaison Wayne Burrow said Sunday morning, “and wanted to make sure they each got a top seed.”



I can only hope this is a harbinger of things to come. The walls between regions, which were abolished after 1998, came down finally this season.

In the past, the only attempts at competitive balance have come at the bottom of the bracket, with a couple of teams moved across regional lines. How much impact can a No.6 or No. 7 seed have on the strength of the bracket?

But moving a No. 1 seed has impact.

It’s not as if East Region No. 1 seeds have had anything to write home about. In the history of the expanded playoffs, those teams are 5-8.

Back in 1999 we advocated moving a team over to become the top seed in the East. Lycoming was available, sitting as the No. 2 seed in the South, and is a heck of a lot closer to the East Region than Mount Union is. (In 1999 the MAC was in the South Region.)

It seems this year’s committee placed a stronger emphasis on teams in strong conferences, as well. The WIAC went through some years where it was underrepresented in the NCAA playoffs but this
year the conference actually got a gift – not just a second team in the playoffs but another chance to win two first-round games. The OAC runner-up has always gotten extra respect because teams have to play Mount Union in the regular season. And the Empire 8, well, two at-large bids says a lot for what that conference looks like these days. The old committee might well have given Curry the No. 1 seed based on its 11-0 record.

The committee also split up teams in the two strongest conferences. UW-Whitewater and UW-Eau Claire are on opposite ends of the bracket and could meet in the Stagg Bowl, as could Mount Union and Capital.

Now, admittedly, there are dangers in all this. Where do we fall down the slippery slope toward subjective rankings and going back toward the old days? The less political the process is, the more open it is. And the more open the selection process is, the easier it is for teams to know what they need to do to get in.

So bravo, NCAA. But be careful.
Permalink  | Nov 11, 2007